| Should we visit Burma? |
Daw Aung San Suu Kyi has
requested people not to come to Burma until there has been
some progress towards reconciliation and democratization in
Burma.
In order to make an informed decision about whether you should
go to Burma or not, look at 'Burma' on the Tourism Concern
website:
|
| What is
the European Union’s official position on Burma? |
The European
Union maintains a Common Position (EUCP) on Burma. Since first
agreed in 1996 it has been reviewed and amended to reflect
EU policy on prevailing political conditions in the country.
The EUCP is routinely reviewed twice-yearly but can be reviewed
earlier if deemed warranted. The current EUCP, agreed in April
2006, together with EU Council Regulation
- arms embargo on Burma,
- ban on financial loans and other investments in listed Burmese
state-owned enterprises (not retrospective, does not prejudice
existing contracts),
- visa ban on named senior military figures of the rank of
Brigadier General and above, together with their families,
- assets freeze on named senior military figures and their
families,
- suspension of non-humanitarian aid. |
| What is
the United States official position on Burma? |
On July 28 2003 George
W Bush, with near-unanimous support from both houses of Congress,
signed into law the
and an accompanying executive order which
imposes
- an arms embargo,
- a ban on the import of all Burmese products,
- a prohibition on the export of financial services,
- a targeted asset freeze,
- visa restrictions against the junta.
The US has recently passed legislation
to allow resettlement of some ethnic, Karen refugees in the
US. |
| What is ASEAN?
|
|
was established in 1967 by five member
countries; Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and
Thailand. Membership has since been extended to include Brunei
Darussalam (1984), Vietnam (1995), Laos and Burma/Myanmar
(both 1997) and Cambodia (1999).
ASEAN was launched with
the release of ‘The ASEAN Declaration’, which
states the aims and purposes of the Association include (i)
to accelerate the econmic growth, social progress and cultural
development in the region through joint endeavours in the
spirit of equality and partnership in order to strengthen
the foundation for a prosperous and peaceful community of
Southeast Asian nations, and (ii) to promote regional peace
and stability through abiding respect for justice and the
rule of law in the relationship among countries in the region
and adherence to the principles of the United Nations Charter.
In 1995, the ASEAN Heads of States and
Government re-affirmed that “Cooperative peace and shared
prosperity shall be the fundamental goals of ASEAN.”
The highest decision-making
level in ASEAN is the ASEAN Summit, a meeting of the all member
Heads of State and Government. There have been 10 ASEAN summits
since the first in Bali 1976. Summits are now convened each
year, with the most recent in Vientianne, Laos in November
2004. ASEAN Foreign Ministerial Meeting are also held on an
annual basis. Ministerial meetings on several other sectors
are also held including agriculture and forestry, economics,
energy, environment, finance, investment, labour and law.
Supporting these ministerial bodies are 29 committees of senior
officials and 122 technical working groups. In 2006, ASEAN
members agreed that Burma should not assume the rotating chairmanship,
which is presently held by the Philippines. |
| What is ASEAN’s
official position on Burma? |
ASEAN’s
position regarding the ongoing political and social turmoil
in Burma and the consequent destabilising effect in the region
is to use ‘constructive engagement’ with the regime
based on a guiding principle of ‘non-interference in
the internal affairs of a member state’. This policy
stems from The Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC) in Southeast
Asia, signed at the First ASEAN Summit on 24 February 1976.
It declared that in their relations with one another, ASEAN
member states should be guided by the following fundamental
principles:
· Mutual respect for the independence, sovereignty,
equality, territorial integrity, and national identity of
all nations;
· The right of every State to lead its national existence
free from external interference, subversion or coercion;
· Non-interference in the internal affairs of one another;
· Settlement of differences or disputes by peaceful
manner;
· Renunciation of the threat or use of force; and
· Effective cooperation among themselves. |
| What is
ASEM? |
ASEM (the
Asia-Europe Meeting) was established in 1996 as an interregional
forum between Asia and the European Union (EU) based on an
informal process of dialogue and cooperation addressing political,
cultural and economic issues. Membership comprised the 15
EU member states (in 1996), the European Commission and 10
Asian countries; Brunei, China, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.
At the 5th ASEM summit in October 2004, membership was extended
to 13 more countries; Cambodia, Laos and Burma from Asia and
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania,
Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia from the newly expanded
EU. |
| What is
ASEM’s official position on Burma? |
| Under
controversial circumstances Burma became a member at the 5th
ASEM summit in October 2004, along with Laos and Cambodia,
and continues to remain a source of tension within ASEM. Prior
to the decision to grant membership, there had been some opposition
among EU states to admitting Burma. In the 6th ASEM Foreign
Ministers meeting in Kildare, Ireland in April 2004 this opposition
had resulted in three minimum requirements being set for Burma’s
participation, namely that,
- Aung San Suu Kyi and all detained political leaders be released,
- the National Convention re-convened in May 2004 be modified
and a time frame established and
- the National League for Democracy be allowed to participate
freely in the National Convention.
By October 2004 however, the EU members chose to waive these
requirements when faced with the prospect that some Asian
member would retaliate by blocking the proposed membership
of the ten new EU members.
Following the Eighth
ASEM Foreign Ministers’ meeting, which took place in
Hamburg from 28th –29th May,2007, the Conference expressed
its ‘deep concern on the lack of tangible progress in
the declared transition towards a civilian and democratic
government’ in Myanmar (Burma), and also called for
‘the early lifting of restrictions on political parties
and the early release of those under detention, including
Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.’
(ASEM enlargement in
2007 brought in India, Pakistan, Mongolia, Romania, Bulgaria
and the ASEAN Secretariat, increasing ASEM’s constituency
to a total of 45 partners.) |
What positions have the European
Parliament taken on Burma? |
The European
Parliament has in recent years consistently called for a strengthening
of the EUCP on Burma including an import ban.
On the question of Burma’s admittance
to ASEM.
[EP
resolution on Burma/ASEM, 2005 ]
|
| Who are
the NCGUB and what do they stand for? |
The National
League for Democracy (NLD) won a resounding victory in the
1990 elections, winning 82% of the parliamentary seats. In
the wake of the election results, the ruling military junta
launched a systematic campaign to prevent the NLD from forming
a government; offices were closed down, members harassed,
and elected MsPs and senor officials arrested or forced to
flee to Thailand. The junta also imprisoned NLD Chairman U
Tin Oo and placed General Secretary Daw Aung San Suu Kyi under
house arrest.
was officially formed on December 18
1990. It is constituted by elected NLD and other MPs forced
into exile and Dr Sein Win was declared Burma’s Prime
Minister in exile. One of the founding principles was that
the NCGUB would be dissolved once democracy and human rights
are restored in Burma.
The NCGUB has called
for,
- the release of all political prisoners,
- an end to human right abuses and
- the start of meaningful tripartite talks between the regime,
the ethnic nationalities and duly elected political representatives,
aimed at a timetabled transition to democracy and national
reconciliation.
- Has supported the USA import ban, the EU Common Position
and the formation of the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Myanmar
Caucus to try and resolve the political impasse in Burma.
- Has also called on the UN Secretary General to bring the
issue of Burma to the UN Security Council under Article 99
of the UN Charter “The Secretary-General may bring to
the attention of the Security Council any matter which in
his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international
peace and security”. |
| |
| |
|